On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I'd like to keep this somewhat orthogonal to the x86 changes (e.g. as other
> architectures will need backports to stable at least for the RCU bug fix), so
> I'd rather use a name that isn't immediately coupled with x86 changes.
Ah, gotcha.
> Does the guest_context_{enter,exit}_irqoff() naming above work for you?
Yep, thanks!
