Re: KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU

Subject: Re: KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:36:16 +0100
Cc: butterflyhuangxx@xxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>, Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <b6d9785d769f98da0b057fac643b0f088e346a94.camel@infradead.org>
References: <e8f40b8765f2feefb653d8a67e487818f66581aa.camel@infradead.org> <20220113120609.736701-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com> <e9e5521d-21e5-8f6f-902c-17b0516b9839@redhat.com> <b6d9785d769f98da0b057fac643b0f088e346a94.camel@infradead.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0

On 1/13/22 13:30, David Woodhouse wrote:

Are you proposing that as an officially documented part of the already
horrid API, or a temporary measure:)


Hopefully temporary, but honestly you never know how these things go.

Paolo

References:
- KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU
  - From: David Woodhouse
- Re: KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU
  - From: Christian Borntraeger
- Re: KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without an active vCPU
  - From: David Woodhouse