On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > >From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > >I take that back, "struct invpcid_desc" is the one that's "wrong". Again, > >doesn't truly matter as attempting to build on 32-bit would fail due to the > >bitfield values exceeding the storage capacity of an unsigned long. But to be > >pedantic, maybe this? > > Sorry for late response. Not clear why the mail went into junk box automatically. No worries, I know that pain all too well. > Yea, I think your change is better. Will you send formal patch with your change > or you want me to do that? No preference. If you get to it, great, if not I'll send a patch in a day or two.
