Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio: Update/Clarify migration uAPI, add NDMA state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:00:13AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > Devices that are poorly designed here will have very long migration
> > downtime latencies and people simply won't want to use them.
> 
> Different usages have different latency requirement. Do we just want
> people to decide whether to manage state for a device by
> measurement?

It doesn't seem unreasonable to allow userspace to set max timer for
NDMA for SLA purposes on devices that have unbounded NDMA times. It
would probably be some new optional ioctl for devices that can
implement it.

However, this basically gives up on the idea that a VM can be migrated
as any migration can timeout and fail under this philosophy. I think
that is still very poor.

Optional migration really can't be sane path forward.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux