Re: [patch 5/6] x86/fpu: Provide fpu_update_guest_xcr0/xfd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/16/21 11:21, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Paolo Bonzini
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 6:41 PM

There's also another important thing that hasn't been mentioned so far:
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID should _not_ include the dynamic bits in
CPUID[0xD] if they have not been requested with prctl.  It's okay to
return the AMX bit, but not the bit in CPUID[0xD].

There is no vcpu in this ioctl, thus we cannot check vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.perm.

This then requires exposing xstate_get_guest_group_perm() to KVM.

Right, this is a generic /dev/kvm ioctl therefore it has to check the process state.

Thomas, are you OK with this change given Paolo's ask? v1 included
this change but it was not necessary at the moment:

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87lf0ot50q.ffs@tglx/

and Paolo, do we want to document that prctl() must be done before
calling KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID? If yes, where is the proper location?

You can document it under the KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl.

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux