On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:08:37PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The check on x86ms->apic_id_limit in pc_machine_done() had two problems.
>
> Firstly, we need KVM to support the X2APIC API in order to allow IRQ
> delivery to APICs >= 255. So we need to call/check kvm_enable_x2apic(),
> which was done elsewhere in *some* cases but not all.
>
> Secondly, microvm needs the same check. So move it from pc_machine_done()
> to x86_cpus_init() where it will work for both.
>
> The check in kvm_cpu_instance_init() is now redundant and can be dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 8 --------
> hw/i386/x86.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index a2ef40ecbc..9959f93216 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -736,14 +736,6 @@ void pc_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
> /* update FW_CFG_NB_CPUS to account for -device added CPUs */
> fw_cfg_modify_i16(x86ms->fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, x86ms->boot_cpus);
> }
> -
> -
> - if (x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 && !xen_enabled() &&
> - !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> - error_report("current -smp configuration requires kernel "
> - "irqchip support.");
> - exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> - }
> }
>
> void pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index b84840a1bb..f64639b873 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include "sysemu/replay.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> #include "sysemu/cpu-timers.h"
> +#include "sysemu/xen.h"
> #include "trace.h"
>
> #include "hw/i386/x86.h"
> @@ -136,6 +137,21 @@ void x86_cpus_init(X86MachineState *x86ms, int default_cpu_version)
> */
> x86ms->apic_id_limit = x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(x86ms,
> ms->smp.max_cpus - 1) + 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Can we support APIC ID 255 or higher?
> + *
> + * Under Xen: yes.
> + * With userspace emulated lapic: no
> + * With KVM's in-kernel lapic: only if X2APIC API is enabled.
> + */
> + if (x86ms->apic_id_limit > 255 && !xen_enabled() &&
> + (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() || !kvm_enable_x2apic())) {
I'm wondering whether we should still leave it be in the accel code, or is
therer something that guarantees when reaching here kvm accel is initialized?
> + error_report("current -smp configuration requires kernel "
> + "irqchip and X2APIC API support.");
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> possible_cpus = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(ms);
> for (i = 0; i < ms->smp.cpus; i++) {
> x86_cpu_new(x86ms, possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id, &error_fatal);
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index d95028018e..c60cb2dafb 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void kvm_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
> /* only applies to builtin_x86_defs cpus */
> if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> x86_cpu_change_kvm_default("x2apic", "off");
> - } else if (kvm_irqchip_is_split() && kvm_enable_x2apic()) {
> + } else if (kvm_irqchip_is_split()) {
> x86_cpu_change_kvm_default("kvm-msi-ext-dest-id", "on");
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Peter Xu
