Hi, Thomas, > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 5:23 AM > > Paolo, > > On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 20:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13 2021 at 16:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> That said, I think xfd_update_state should not have an argument. > >> current->thread.fpu.fpstate->xfd is the only fpstate that should be > >> synced with the xfd_state per-CPU variable. > > > > I'm looking into this right now. The whole restore versus runtime thing > > needs to be handled differently. > After looking at your series, I think it missed Paolo's comment about changing xfd_update_state() to accept no argument. Thanks Kevin
