Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactoring find_arch_event() to pmc_perf_hw_id()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/9/21 04:52, Jim Mattson wrote:
Why don't we just use PERF_TYPE_RAW for guest counters all of the
time? What is the advantage of matching entries in a table so that we
can use PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE?

In theory it's so that hosts without support for architectural PMU events can map the architectural PMU events to their own. In practice, we can probably return early from intel_pmu_refresh if the host does not support X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON, because only the oldest Pentium 4 toasters^Wprocessors probably have VMX but lack architectural PMU.

Paolo



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux