On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 12:12 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 07.12.21 um 21:57 schrieb Matthew Rosato:
> > Detect the zPCI Load/Store Interpretation facility.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h | 1 +
> > drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> > b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> > index c68ea35de498..c84e8e0ca344 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct sclp_info {
> > unsigned char has_diag318 : 1;
> > unsigned char has_sipl : 1;
> > unsigned char has_dirq : 1;
> > + unsigned char has_zpci_interp : 1;
>
> maybe use zpci_lsi (load store interpretion) as pci interpretion
> would be something else (also fix the the subject line).
> With that
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
My r-b can stay with Christian's suggested change.
>
>
> > unsigned int ibc;
> > unsigned int mtid;
> > unsigned int mtid_cp;
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> > b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> > index b64feab62caa..2e8199b7ae50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static void __init
> > sclp_early_facilities_detect(void)
> > sclp.has_gisaf = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x08);
> > sclp.has_hvs = !!(sccb->fac119 & 0x80);
> > sclp.has_kss = !!(sccb->fac98 & 0x01);
> > + sclp.has_zpci_interp = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x01);
> > if (sccb->fac85 & 0x02)
> > S390_lowcore.machine_flags |= MACHINE_FLAG_ESOP;
> > if (sccb->fac91 & 0x40)
> >
