On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 20:39 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > kvm_vcpu_apicv_active() returns false if a virtual machine has no in-kernel
> > local APIC, however kvm_apicv_activated might still be true if there are
> > no reasons to disable APICv; in fact it is quite likely that there is none
> > because APICv is inhibited by specific configurations of the local APIC
> > and those configurations cannot be programmed. This triggers a WARN:
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_apicv_activated(vcpu->kvm) != kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu));
> >
> > To avoid this, introduce another cause for APICv inhibition, namely the
> > absence of an in-kernel local APIC. This cause is enabled by default,
> > and is dropped by either KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP or the enabling of
> > KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP_SPLIT.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: ee49a8932971 ("KVM: x86: Move SVM's APICv sanity check to common x86", 2021-10-22)
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 0ee1a039b490..e0aa4dd53c7f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -5740,6 +5740,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
> > smp_wmb();
> > kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT;
> > kvm->arch.nr_reserved_ioapic_pins = cap->args[0];
> > + kvm_request_apicv_update(kvm, true, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT);
> > r = 0;
> > split_irqchip_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > @@ -6120,6 +6121,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > /* Write kvm->irq_routing before enabling irqchip_in_kernel. */
> > smp_wmb();
> > kvm->arch.irqchip_mode = KVM_IRQCHIP_KERNEL;
> > + kvm_request_apicv_update(kvm, true, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT);
>
> Blech, kvm_request_apicv_update() is very counter-intuitive, true == clear. :-/
> Wrappers along the lines of kvm_{set,clear}_apicv_inhibit() would help a lot, and
> would likely avoid a handful of newlines as well. I'll send a patch on top of this,
> unless you want to do it while pushing this one out.
100% agree that kvm_request_apicv_update() is very counter-intuitive!
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> > create_irqchip_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > break;
> > @@ -8818,10 +8820,9 @@ static void kvm_apicv_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > init_rwsem(&kvm->arch.apicv_update_lock);
> >
> > - if (enable_apicv)
> > - clear_bit(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLE,
> > - &kvm->arch.apicv_inhibit_reasons);
> > - else
> > + set_bit(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT,
> > + &kvm->arch.apicv_inhibit_reasons);
>
> Nit, this one fits on a single line.
>
> > + if (!enable_apicv)
> > set_bit(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLE,
> > &kvm->arch.apicv_inhibit_reasons);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
