Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/06/2009 06:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> User space may not want to overwrite asynchronously changing VCPU event >> states on write-back. So allow to skip nmi.pending and sipi_vector by >> setting corresponding bits in the flags field of kvm_vcpu_events. >> > > I think a positive flag (do update nmi and sipi_vector) will cause less > confusion, no? If we do that, we'll need to set them on > KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. I'm fine with the former but I don't understand the latter. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
