On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/23/21 02:06, Chao Peng wrote: > > > Maybe the kvm has to be tagged with a sequential id that incremented every > > > allocation. This id can be checked here. > > Sounds like a sequential id will be needed, no existing fields in struct > > kvm can work for this. > > There's no need to new concepts when there's a perfectly usable reference > count. :) Indeed, thanks. > > Paolo
