Re: [PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Graf wrote:
> Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of Linux
> internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the
> possibilities pv-ops delivers though.
>
> On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not
> touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to become
> fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in!
>
> This patchset splits pv-ops into several smaller config options split by
> feature category and then converts the KVM pv-ops code to use only the
> bits that are required, lowering overhead.
>   

So has this ended up in some tree yet?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux