On 11/16/21 17:34, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
- r = num_online_cpus(); + /* + * ARM64 treats KVM_CAP_NR_CPUS differently from all other + * architectures, as it does not always bound it to + * num_online_cpus(). It should not matter much because this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS (sorry for the typo in my suggestion). I'll fix it when applying.
Paolo
+ * is just an advisory value. + */ + r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), + kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus());