Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] s390x: fixing I/O memory allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/11/21 11:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 11.11.21 11:28, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:14:53 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11.11.21 11:01, Pierre Morel wrote:
The allocator allocate pages it follows the size must be rounded
to pages before the allocation.

Fixes: b0fe3988 "s390x: define UV compatible I/O allocation"

What's the symptom of this? A failing test? Or is this just a pro-activ fix?

if size < PAGE_SIZE then we would allocate 0, and in general we are
rounding down instead of up, which is obviously wrong.


I know, but is this fixing a failing test or is this just a pro-activ fix?


It is not fixing an existing test but it must be fixed before the VIRTIO test that I am currently developing. In the current tests we do not allocate sizes greater than 1 page that are no multiple of pages.

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux