On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:47 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08.11.21 21:15, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:14 PM Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:51 AM Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Commit 76b4f357d0e7d8f6f00 ("x86/kvm: fix vcpu-id indexed array sizes")
> >>> has wrong reasoning, as KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID is not defining the maximum
> >>> allowed vcpu-id as its name suggests, but the number of vcpu-ids.
> >>>
> >>> So revert this patch again.
> >>>
> >>> Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> The original commit 76b4f357d0e7d8f6f00 CC'ed Stable but this revert
> >> does not. Looking at the stable branches, I see the original has been
> >> reverted but this hasn't. Should this be added to Stable as well?
> >
> > *the original has been incorporated into the stable branches but this hasn't.
>
> Just yesterday I received mails that this patch has been added to the
> stable branches.
>
>
> Juergen
Oh wonderful, what a coincidence!
Thanks,
Ben
