On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 17:21 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > This is useful for debug and also makes it consistent with > > the rest of the SVM optional features. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > index 21bb81710e0f6..2b5f8e10d686d 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > @@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ module_param(vls, int, 0444); > > static int vgif = true; > > module_param(vgif, int, 0444); > > > > +static int tsc_scaling = true; > > +module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444); > > + > > /* enable/disable LBR virtualization */ > > static int lbrv = true; > > module_param(lbrv, int, 0444); > > > > -static int tsc_scaling = true; > > -module_param(tsc_scaling, int, 0444); > > Subject line says "KVM: x86: SVM: add module param to control LBR > virtualization" but the patch just moves 'tsc_scaling' param a couple > lines up. Was this intended or is this a rebase artifact and the patch > just needs to be dropped? Yes, I didn't notice when I rebased the series last time, that this patch was accepted already. Sorry for the noise. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky > > > > > /* > > * enable / disable AVIC. Because the defaults differ for APICv
