Re: Breakage due to commit c1699988 ("v3: don't call reset functions on cpu initialization")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> A qemu-kvm which merges this commit breaks badly (see qemu-kvm.git next
>> branch).  In the commit log for this commit, you write
>>
>>     I tested it with qemu (with and without io-thread) and qemu-kvm, and it
>>     seems to be doing okay - although qemu-kvm uses a slightly different
>> patch.
>>
>> Can you share the slightly different patch (against 'next') please?
> Sorry, I don't follow. You said you tested it and it works, so what exactly
> do we need from me here?
FYI: Combining that patch with a later fix from Juan fix the issue for qemu-kvm.
(504c2948)
Also, the patch seems to apply fine ontop of next.

I can send a combined version if you want, or you can combine it yourself


-- 
Glauber  Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux