On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 17:02, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 20/10/21 10:52, Wanpeng Li wrote: > > From: Wanpeng Li<wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > SDM mentioned that we should #GP for rdpmc if ECX is not valid or > > (CR4.PCE is 0 and CPL is 1, 2, or 3 and CR0.PE is 1). > > > > Let's add the CR0.PE is 1 checking to rdpmc emulate, though this isn't > > strictly necessary since it's impossible for CPL to be >0 if CR0.PE=0. > > > > Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li<wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v3 -> v4: > > * add comments instead of pseudocode > > No, the commit message was fine. What I meant is there's no need to > change the code. Just add a comment about why CR0.PE isn't tested. Just sent out a new version. Wanpeng