On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:23:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently check SCTLR_EL1.EE when computing the address of
> a faulting guest access. However, the fault could have occured at
> EL0, in which case the right bit to check would be SCTLR_EL1.E0E.
>
> This is pretty unlikely to cause any issue in practice: You'd have
> to have a guest with a LE EL1 and a BE EL0 (or the other way around),
> and have mapped a device into the EL0 page tables.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: arm64: Fix reporting of endianess when the access originates at EL0
commit: 69adec18e94ff3ca20447916a3bd23ab1d06b878
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
