Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 39/45] KVM: SVM: Introduce ops for the post gfn map and unmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> 
> On 10/13/21 1:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Side topic, what do you think about s/assigned/private for the "public" APIs, as
> > suggested/implied above?  I actually like the terminology when talking specifically
> > about the RMP, but it doesn't fit the abstractions that tend to be used when talking
> > about these things in other contexts, e.g. in KVM.
> 
> I can float the idea to see if docs folks is okay with the changes but
> generally speaking we all have been referring the assigned == private in
> the Linux SNP support patch.

Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything remotely close to an "official" change, it was
purely a suggestion for the host-side patches.  It might even be unique to this
one helper.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux