On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > On 10/13/21 1:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Side topic, what do you think about s/assigned/private for the "public" APIs, as > > suggested/implied above? I actually like the terminology when talking specifically > > about the RMP, but it doesn't fit the abstractions that tend to be used when talking > > about these things in other contexts, e.g. in KVM. > > I can float the idea to see if docs folks is okay with the changes but > generally speaking we all have been referring the assigned == private in > the Linux SNP support patch. Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything remotely close to an "official" change, it was purely a suggestion for the host-side patches. It might even be unique to this one helper.
