Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, David Stevens wrote:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Remove two warnings that require ref counts for pages to be non-zero, as
> mapped pfns from follow_pfn may not have an initialized ref count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 7 -------
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c    | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 5a1adcc9cfbc..3b469df63bcf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -617,13 +617,6 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>  
>  	pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * KVM does not hold the refcount of the page used by
> -	 * kvm mmu, before reclaiming the page, we should
> -	 * unmap it from mmu first.
> -	 */
> -	WARN_ON(!kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) && !page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn)));

Have you actually observed false positives with this WARN?  I would expect anything
without a struct page to get filtered out by !kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn).

If you have observed false positives, I would strongly prefer we find a way to
keep the page_count() sanity check, it has proven very helpful in the past in
finding/debugging bugs during MMU development.

> -
>  	if (is_accessed_spte(old_spte))
>  		kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
>  



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux