This capability exists, but we don't record anything when userspace enables it. Let's refactor that code so that a note can be made in the debug logs that it was enabled. Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 6 +++--- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index 33d71fa42d68..48ac0bd05bee 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -2487,8 +2487,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, case KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND: { struct kvm_pv_cmd args; - /* protvirt means user sigp */ - kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl = 1; + /* protvirt means user cpu state */ + kvm_s390_set_user_cpu_state_ctrl(kvm); r = 0; if (!is_prot_virt_host()) { r = -EINVAL; @@ -3801,7 +3801,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vcpu_load(vcpu); /* user space knows about this interface - let it control the state */ - vcpu->kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl = 1; + kvm_s390_set_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm); switch (mp_state->mp_state) { case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED: diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h index 57c5e9369d65..36f4d585513c 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h @@ -208,6 +208,15 @@ static inline int kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm) return kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl != 0; } +static inline void kvm_s390_set_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + if (kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl) + return; + + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "%s", "ENABLE: Userspace CPU state control"); + kvm->arch.user_cpu_state_ctrl = 1; +} + /* implemented in pv.c */ int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc); int kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc); -- 2.25.1