Hi Marc, sed s/valitity/validity/ <<<"$SUBJECT" On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 06:48:35PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Don't blindly assume that the PTE is valid when checking whether > it describes an executable or cacheable mapping. > > This makes sure that we don't issue CMOs for invalid mappings. > > Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > index f8ceebe4982e..6bbfd952f0c5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > @@ -638,12 +638,12 @@ static void stage2_put_pte(kvm_pte_t *ptep, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 addr, > static bool stage2_pte_cacheable(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, kvm_pte_t pte) > { > u64 memattr = pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_MEMATTR; > - return memattr == KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL); > + return kvm_pte_valid(pte) && memattr == KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL); > } > > static bool stage2_pte_executable(kvm_pte_t pte) > { > - return !(pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN); > + return kvm_pte_valid(pte) && !(pte & KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN); > } > > static bool stage2_leaf_mapping_allowed(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, > @@ -688,8 +688,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, > /* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */ > if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new)) > mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), > - granule); > - > + granule); > if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new)) > mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule); > > @@ -1091,7 +1090,7 @@ static int stage2_flush_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, kvm_pte_t *ptep, > kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep; > kvm_pte_t *pte_follow; > > - if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte) || !stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, pte)) > + if (!stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, pte)) > return 0; > > pte_follow = kvm_pte_follow(pte, mm_ops); > -- > 2.30.2 > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>