On 05/10/2021 12.30, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 05/10/2021 11.09, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
Test that specification exceptions cause the correct interruption code
during both normal and transactional execution.
The last three patches are cosmetic only and could be dropped.
Unrelated: There should not be * in the file patterns in MAINTAINERS,
should there?
I think those could be dropped, indeed. Care to send a patch?
You mean the * patterns, not the cosmetic patches, correct?
-- >8 --
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Include subdirectories in file
patterns
The * pattern does not cover subdirectories, so get_maintainer.pl does
not know who maintains e.g. lib/<arch>/asm/*.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4fc01a5..15b5e1b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ M: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
S: Supported
L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
L: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-F: arm/*
-F: lib/arm/*
-F: lib/arm64/*
+F: arm/
+F: lib/arm/
+F: lib/arm64/
T: https://gitlab.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests.git
POWERPC
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ M: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
S: Maintained
L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
L: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-F: powerpc/*
-F: lib/powerpc/*
-F: lib/ppc64/*
+F: powerpc/
+F: lib/powerpc/
+F: lib/ppc64/
S390X
M: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
@@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ R: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
R: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
L: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-F: s390x/*
-F: lib/s390x/*
+F: s390x/
+F: lib/s390x/
X86
M: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
S: Supported
L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-F: x86/*
-F: lib/x86/*
+F: x86/
+F: lib/x86/
T: https://gitlab.com/bonzini/kvm-unit-tests.git
base-commit: fe26131eec769cef7ad7e2e1e4e192aa0bdb2bba
Thanks, applied.
Thomas
