On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:16:03PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> The naming of the kvm_req_sleep function is confusing: the function
> itself sleeps the vCPU, it does not request such an event. Rename the
> function to make its purpose more clear.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index fe102cd2e518..3d4acd354f94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> }
>
> -static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static void kvm_vcpu_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct rcuwait *wait = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu);
>
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static void check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
> if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu))
> - vcpu_req_sleep(vcpu);
> + kvm_vcpu_sleep(vcpu);
>
> if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET, vcpu))
> kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
> --
> 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
