On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:25:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/10/21 12:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > There are other effects of cgroups (e.g. memory accounting) than just the > > > cpumask; > > > > Is kvm-nx-hpage using significant amounts of memory? > > No, that was just an example (and not a good one indeed, because > kvm-nx-hpage is not using a substantial amount of either memory or CPU). > But for example vhost also uses cgroup_attach_task_all, so it should have > the same issue with SCHED_FIFO? Yes. Would need to fix vhost as well. > > > > Why doesn't the scheduler move the task to a CPU that is not being hogged by > > > vCPU SCHED_FIFO tasks? > > Because cpuset placement is enforced: > > Yes, but I would expect the parent cgroup to include both isolated CPUs (for > the vCPU threads) and non-isolated housekeeping vCPUs (for the QEMU I/O > thread). Yes, the parent, but why would that matter? If you are in a child cpuset, you are restricted to the child cpuset mask (and not the parents). > The QEMU I/O thread is not hogging the CPU 100% of the time, and > therefore the nx-recovery thread should be able to run on that CPU. Yes, but: 1) The cpumask of the parent thread is not inherited set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_KTHREAD)); On __kthread_create_on_node should fail (because its cgroup, the one inherited from QEMU, contains only isolated CPUs). (The QEMU I/O thread runs on an isolated CPU, and is moved by libvirt to HK-cgroup as mentioned before). 2) What if kernel threads that should be pinned to non-isolated CPUs are created from vcpus? > > Thanks, > > Paolo > > > CPUSET(7) Linux Programmer's Manual CPUSET(7) > > > > Cpusets are integrated with the sched_setaffinity(2) scheduling affinity mechanism and the > > mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) memory-placement mechanisms in the kernel. Neither of these > > mechanisms let a process make use of a CPU or memory node that is not allowed by that > > process's cpuset. If changes to a process's cpuset placement conflict with these other > > mechanisms, then cpuset placement is enforced even if it means overriding these other mech‐ > > anisms. The kernel accomplishes this overriding by silently restricting the CPUs and mem‐ > > ory nodes requested by these other mechanisms to those allowed by the invoking process's > > cpuset. This can result in these other calls returning an error, if for example, such a > > call ends up requesting an empty set of CPUs or memory nodes, after that request is > > restricted to the invoking process's cpuset. > > > > > >