Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] nSVM: introduce smv->nested.save to cache save area fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/09/21 00:23, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On a related topic, this would be a good opportunity to resolve the naming
discrepancies between VMX and SVM.  VMX generally refers to vmcs12 as KVM's copy
of L1's VMCS, whereas SVM generally refers to vmcb12 as the "direct" mapping of
L1's VMCB.  I'd prefer to go with VMX's terminology, i.e. rework nSVM to refer to
the copy as vmcb12, but I'm more than a bit biased since I've spent so much time
in nVMX,

I agree, and I think Emanuele's patches are a step in the right direction. Once we ensure that all state in svm->nested is cached vmcb12 content, we can get rid of vmcb12 pointers in the functions.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux