Re: [PATCH 2/2] qemu-kvm: x86: Add support for VCPU event states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/12/2009 02:05 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> This patch extends the qemu-kvm state sync logic with support for
>> KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS, giving access to yet missing exception,
>> interrupt and NMI states.
>>
>> diff --git a/target-i386/machine.c b/target-i386/machine.c
>> index 6bd447f..1eda7c5 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/machine.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/machine.c
>> @@ -452,6 +452,11 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>>           VMSTATE_INT32_V(interrupt_injected, CPUState, 9),
>>           VMSTATE_UINT32_V(mp_state, CPUState, 9),
>>           VMSTATE_UINT64_V(tsc, CPUState, 9),
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT8_V(soft_interrupt, CPUState, 11),
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT8_V(nmi_injected, CPUState, 11),
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT8_V(nmi_pending, CPUState, 11),
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT8_V(has_error_code, CPUState, 11),
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32_V(sipi_vector, CPUState, 11),
>>           /* MCE */
>>           VMSTATE_UINT64_V(mcg_cap, CPUState, 10),
>>           VMSTATE_UINT64_V(mcg_status, CPUState, 10),
>>
>>    
> 
> Is there a reason why you add 11 between 9 and 10?  We'll probably see
> another 11 when someone else adds the next state.
> 

Logical grouping ("/* KVM-related states */"). If anyone once tries to
add non-KVM stuff here just because it's version 12, it should be
rejected. I don't think you have to sort VMSTATE entries by their
version number. Am I right, Juan?

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux