From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> If the original spte is writable, the target gfn should not be the gfn of synchronized shadowpage and can continue to be writable. When !can_unsync, speculative must be false. So when the check of "!can_unsync" is removed, we need to move the label of "out" up. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c index b68a580f3510..a33c581aabd6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level, * is responsibility of kvm_mmu_get_page / kvm_mmu_sync_roots. * Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting. */ - if (!can_unsync && is_writable_pte(old_spte)) + if (is_writable_pte(old_spte)) goto out; /* @@ -171,10 +171,10 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level, if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) spte |= spte_shadow_dirty_mask(spte); +out: if (speculative) spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(spte); -out: WARN_ONCE(is_rsvd_spte(&vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check, spte, level), "spte = 0x%llx, level = %d, rsvd bits = 0x%llx", spte, level, get_rsvd_bits(&vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check, spte, level)); -- 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
