Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2021-09-10 at 18:06 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Introduce a flag to keep track of whether MSR bitmap for L2 needs to be >> rebuilt due to changes in MSR bitmap for L1 or switching to a different >> L2. This information will be used for Enlightened MSR Bitmap feature for >> Hyper-V guests. >> >> Note, setting msr_bitmap_changed to 'true' from set_current_vmptr() is >> not really needed for Enlightened MSR Bitmap as the feature can only >> be used in conjunction with Enlightened VMCS but let's keep tracking >> information complete, it's cheap and in the future similar PV feature can >> easily be implemented for KVM on KVM too. >> >> No functional change intended. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 9 ++++++++- >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 ++ >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 6 ++++++ >> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c >> index ccb03d69546c..42cd95611892 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c >> @@ -2053,10 +2053,13 @@ static enum nested_evmptrld_status nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld( >> * Clean fields data can't be used on VMLAUNCH and when we switch >> * between different L2 guests as KVM keeps a single VMCS12 per L1. >> */ >> - if (from_launch || evmcs_gpa_changed) >> + if (from_launch || evmcs_gpa_changed) { >> vmx->nested.hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields &= >> ~HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_ALL; >> >> + vmx->nested.msr_bitmap_changed = true; >> + } >> + >> return EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED; >> } >> >> @@ -3240,6 +3243,8 @@ static bool nested_get_vmcs12_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> else >> exec_controls_clearbit(vmx, CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS); >> >> + vmx->nested.msr_bitmap_changed = false; > > Very minor nitpick: Maybe I would put this into nested_vmx_prepare_msr_bitmap, > a bit closer to the action, but this is fine like this as well. > I don't have a strong preference here, can move it to nested_vmx_prepare_msr_bitmap(). >> + >> return true; >> } >> >> @@ -5273,6 +5278,7 @@ static void set_current_vmptr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, gpa_t vmptr) >> vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = true; >> } >> vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 = true; >> + vmx->nested.msr_bitmap_changed = true; >> } >> >> /* Emulate the VMPTRLD instruction */ >> @@ -6393,6 +6399,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >> goto error_guest_mode; >> >> vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12 = true; >> + vmx->nested.msr_bitmap_changed = true; > > Is this needed? Setting the nested state should eventually trigger call to > nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld. > > Strictly speaking - no (meaning that nothing is going to change if we just drop this hunk). My intention was to keep tracking information complete: after vmx_set_nested_state() we certainly need to re-build MSR Bitmap 02 and that's what 'msr_bitmap_changed' tracks. We can replace this with a comment if needed (but I'd slightly prefer to keep it - unless there's a reason not to). > >> ret = nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(vcpu, false); >> if (ret) >> goto error_guest_mode; >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c >> index ad33032e8588..2dbfb5d838db 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c >> @@ -3734,6 +3734,8 @@ static void vmx_msr_bitmap_l01_changed(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) >> */ >> if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs)) >> evmcs_touch_msr_bitmap(); >> + >> + vmx->nested.msr_bitmap_changed = true; >> } >> >> void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type) >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h >> index 4858c5fd95f2..b6596fc2943a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h >> @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ struct nested_vmx { >> bool need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync; >> bool dirty_vmcs12; >> >> + /* >> + * Indicates whether MSR bitmap for L2 needs to be rebuilt due to >> + * changes in MSR bitmap for L1 or switching to a different L2. >> + */ >> + bool msr_bitmap_changed; >> + >> /* >> * Indicates lazily loaded guest state has not yet been decached from >> * vmcs02. > > > Best regards, > Maxim Levitsky > -- Vitaly