On 11/10/2009 03:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Since we have very few variable-size states, and their number is
unlikely to increase, ad-hoc handling should be sufficient.
Regarding CPU states, there is actually only the MSR interface.
cpuid internal states too.
So the new roadmap shall be like this:
o Add KVM_X86_GET/SET_EVENT_STATES (instead of
KVM_X86_VCPU_STATE_EVENTS)
o Refactor in-kernel VCPU state IOCTLs to use table-driven dispatching
and shared argument passing
o Maybe refactor user space as well towards a table-driven state sync
(need to think about this a bit more)
Any other comments or does everyone agree?
Looks good to me. These are all independent, of course.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
