On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:21:10PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: > > On 05.09.2021 19:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:02:44PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: > >> On 05.09.2021 18:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:30:13PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: > >>>> This patchset implements support of MSG_EOR bit for SEQPACKET > >>>> AF_VSOCK sockets over virtio transport. > >>>> First we need to define 'messages' and 'records' like this: > >>>> Message is result of sending calls: 'write()', 'send()', 'sendmsg()' > >>>> etc. It has fixed maximum length, and it bounds are visible using > >>>> return from receive calls: 'read()', 'recv()', 'recvmsg()' etc. > >>>> Current implementation based on message definition above. > >>>> Record has unlimited length, it consists of multiple message, > >>>> and bounds of record are visible via MSG_EOR flag returned from > >>>> 'recvmsg()' call. Sender passes MSG_EOR to sending system call and > >>>> receiver will see MSG_EOR when corresponding message will be processed. > >>>> Idea of patchset comes from POSIX: it says that SEQPACKET > >>>> supports record boundaries which are visible for receiver using > >>>> MSG_EOR bit. So, it looks like MSG_EOR is enough thing for SEQPACKET > >>>> and we don't need to maintain boundaries of corresponding send - > >>>> receive system calls. But, for 'sendXXX()' and 'recXXX()' POSIX says, > >>>> that all these calls operates with messages, e.g. 'sendXXX()' sends > >>>> message, while 'recXXX()' reads messages and for SEQPACKET, 'recXXX()' > >>>> must read one entire message from socket, dropping all out of size > >>>> bytes. Thus, both message boundaries and MSG_EOR bit must be supported > >>>> to follow POSIX rules. > >>>> To support MSG_EOR new bit was added along with existing > >>>> 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR': 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM'(end-of-message) - now it > >>>> works in the same way as 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR'. But 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' > >>>> is used to mark 'MSG_EOR' bit passed from userspace. > >>>> This patchset includes simple test for MSG_EOR. > >>> I'm prepared to merge this for this window, > >>> but I'm not sure who's supposed to ack the net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > >>> bits. It's a harmless variable renaming so maybe it does not matter. > >>> > >>> The rest is virtio stuff so I guess my tree is ok. > >>> > >>> Objections, anyone? > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/9/3/76 this is v4. It is same as v5 in af_vsock.c changes. > >> > >> It has Reviewed by from Stefano Garzarella. > > Is Stefano the maintainer for af_vsock then? > > I wasn't sure. > Ack, let's wait for maintainer's comment The specific patch is a trivial variable renaming so I parked this in my tree for now, will merge unless I hear any objections in the next couple of days. > >>> > >>>> Arseny Krasnov(6): > >>>> virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit. > >>>> virtio/vsock: add 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit. > >>>> vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing > >>>> virtio/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing > >>>> af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop > >>>> vsock_test: update message bounds test for MSG_EOR > >>>> > >>>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------- > >>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 3 ++- > >>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 10 ++++---- > >>>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 23 ++++++++++++------- > >>>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 8 ++++++- > >>>> 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> v4 -> v5: > >>>> - Move bitwise and out of le32_to_cpu() in 0003. > >>>> > >>>> v3 -> v4: > >>>> - 'sendXXX()' renamed to 'send*()' in 0002- commit msg. > >>>> - Comment about bit restore updated in 0003-. > >>>> - 'same' renamed to 'similar' in 0003- commit msg. > >>>> - u32 used instead of uint32_t in 0003-. > >>>> > >>>> v2 -> v3: > >>>> - 'virtio/vsock: rename 'EOR' to 'EOM' bit.' - commit message updated. > >>>> - 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' bit add moved to separate patch. > >>>> - 'vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing' - commit message > >>>> updated. > >>>> - 'vhost/vsock: support MSG_EOR bit processing' - removed unneeded > >>>> 'le32_to_cpu()', because input argument was already in CPU > >>>> endianness. > >>>> > >>>> v1 -> v2: > >>>> - 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR' is renamed to 'VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM', to > >>>> support backward compatibility. > >>>> - use bitmask of flags to restore in vhost.c, instead of separated > >>>> bool variable for each flag. > >>>> - test for EAGAIN removed, as logically it is not part of this > >>>> patchset(will be sent separately). > >>>> - cover letter updated(added part with POSIX description). > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.25.1 > >
