Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Drop the unused function as reported by test bot. >> >> Your subject line says "Drop unused kvm_dirty_gfn_harvested()" while in >> reallity you drop "kvm_dirty_gfn_invalid()". > > Heh, Peter already sent v2[*]. Though that's a good reminder that it's helpful > to reviewers to respond to your own patch if there's a fatal mistake and you're > going to immediately post a new version. For tiny patches it's not a big deal, > but for larger patches it can avoid wasting reviewers' time. > Indeed. It's also a good reminder for reviewers that inbox is best treated like a stack and not like a queue :-) -- Vitaly
