On 8/31/21 3:46 PM, Dov Murik wrote:
+ + return count + 1;As Borislav noted, you can remove the "if (!count) return 1" because in that case (count==0) the "return count+1" will return exactly 1.
Yep, I am working to simplify it based on the Boris feedback. I will incorporate the feedback in v6. thanks