On 8/23/21 12:20 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 12:35:00 +0800
Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
remove it because SPDX-License-Identifier is already used
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c
index 7b011b62c766..dfd8d826223d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_zdev.c
@@ -5,11 +5,6 @@
* Copyright (C) IBM Corp. 2020. All rights reserved.
* Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
*/
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
The SPDX license for this file is actually GPL-2.0+ but the text here
matches the more restrictive GPL-2.0. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd expect
the more restrictive license holds, so removing this text might
actually change the license. Should this also correct the SPDX
license? Perhaps we need clarification from the authors. Thanks,
Alex
Oh, good catch. Yeah, I think if you're going to remove the verbose
text, then the identifier should be 'SPDX-License-Identifier:
GPL-2.0-only' to match the verbose text you're removing.
