Re: [PATCH] Add VirtIO Frame Buffer Support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2009 10:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Exactly. In fact, I'm even scared to reboot mine because I might end up in a 3270 terminal. The whole text only crap keeps people from using this platform! And that's what I want to change here.

Ok. I oppose paravirtualization for its own sake and only support it if there's no other way to get performance. In this case it buys us basic functionality which is surprisingly missing on native, that's arguably even more important.

There is no "native" on s390.  Everything is "paravirtual".

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux