Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] Initial x86_64 UEFI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:48 AM Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This series brings EFI support to a reduced subset of kvm-unit-tests
> on x86_64. I'm sending it out for early review since it covers enough
> ground to allow adding KVM testcases for EFI-only environments.
>
> EFI support works by changing the test entrypoint to a stub entry
> point for the EFI loader to jump to in long mode, where the test binary
> exits EFI boot services, performs the remaining CPU bootstrapping,
> and then calls the testcase main().
>
> Since the EFI loader only understands PE objects, the first commit
> introduces a `configure --efi` mode which builds each test as a shared
> lib. This shared lib is repackaged into a PE via objdump.
>
> Commit 2-4 take a trip from the asm entrypoint to C to exit EFI and
> relocate ELF .dynamic contents.
>
> Commit 5 adds post-EFI long mode x86_64 setup and calls the testcase.
>
> Commit 6 patches out some broken tests for EFI. Testcases that refuse
> to build as shared libs are also left disabled, these need some massaging.
>
> git tree: https://github.com/varadgautam/kvm-unit-tests/commits/efi-stub

Thanks for this patchset. My colleague, Zixuan Wang
<zixuanwang@xxxxxxxxxx>, has also been working to extend
kvm-unit-tests to run under UEFI. Our goal is to enable running
kvm-unit-tests under SEV-ES.

Our approach is a bit different. Rather than pull in bits of the EFI
library and Linux EFI ABI, we've elected to build the entire
kvm-unit-tests binaries as an EFI app (similar to the ARM approach).

To date, we have _most_ x86 test cases (39/44) working under UEFI and
we've also got some of the test cases to boot under SEV-ES, using the
UEFI #VC handler.

We will post our patchset as soon as possible (hopefully by Monday) so
that the community can see our approach. We are very eager to see
kvm-unit-tests running under SEV-ES (and SNP) and are happy to work
with you all on either approach, depending on what the community
thinks is the best approach.

Thanks in advance,
Marc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux