<snip>
> +static void invalidate_pte(struct hpte_cache *pte)
> +{
> + dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing SPT %d: 0x%llx (0x%llx) -> 0x%llx\n",
> + i, pte->pte.eaddr, pte->pte.vpage, pte->host_va);
> +
> + ppc_md.hpte_invalidate(pte->slot, pte->host_va,
> + MMU_PAGE_4K, MMU_SEGSIZE_256M,
> + false);
Are we assuming 256M segments here (and elsewhere)?
<snip>
> +static int kvmppc_mmu_next_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong esid)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int max_slb_size = 64;
> + int found_inval = -1;
> + int r;
> +
> + if (!get_paca()->kvm_slb_max)
> + get_paca()->kvm_slb_max = 1;
> +
> + /* Are we overwriting? */
> + for (i = 1; i < get_paca()->kvm_slb_max; i++) {
> + if (!(get_paca()->kvm_slb[i].esid & SLB_ESID_V))
> + found_inval = i;
> + else if ((get_paca()->kvm_slb[i].esid & ESID_MASK) == esid)
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> + /* Found a spare entry that was invalidated before */
> + if (found_inval > 0)
> + return found_inval;
> +
> + /* No spare invalid entry, so create one */
> +
> + if (mmu_slb_size < 64)
> + max_slb_size = mmu_slb_size;
Can we just use the global mmu_slb_size eliminate max_slb_size?
<snip>
Mikey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
