On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 12:46, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 09:39:46AM +0300, mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > is_core_idle() was using a wrong variable in the loop test. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
> ---
> Subject: sched/numa: Fix is_core_idle()
> From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:39:46 +0300
>
> From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Use the loop variable instead of the function argument to test the
> other SMT siblings for idle.
>
> Fixes: ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks")
> Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210722063946.28951-1-mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxx
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static inline bool is_core_idle(int cpu)
> if (cpu == sibling)
> continue;
>
> - if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> + if (!idle_cpu(sibling))
> return false;
> }
> #endif
Acked-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
