On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, Peter Xu wrote:
> Add a counter field into pte_list_desc, so as to simplify the add/remove/loop
> logic. E.g., we don't need to loop over the array any more for most reasons.
>
> This will make more sense after we've switched the array size to be larger
> otherwise the counter will be a waste.
>
> Initially I wanted to store a tail pointer at the head of the array list so we
> don't need to traverse the list at least for pushing new ones (if without the
> counter we traverse both the list and the array). However that'll need
> slightly more change without a huge lot benefit, e.g., after we grow entry
> numbers per array the list traversing is not so expensive.
>
> So let's be simple but still try to get as much benefit as we can with just
> these extra few lines of changes (not to mention the code looks easier too
> without looping over arrays).
>
> I used the same a test case to fork 500 child and recycle them ("./rmap_fork
> 500" [1]), this patch further speeds up the total fork time of about 14%, which
> is a total of 38% of vanilla kernel:
>
> Vanilla: 367.20 (+-4.58%)
> 3->15 slots: 302.00 (+-5.30%)
> Add counter: 265.20 (+-9.88%)
>
> [1] https://github.com/xzpeter/clibs/commit/825436f825453de2ea5aaee4bdb1c92281efe5b3
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 9b093985a2ef..ba0258bdebc4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -138,10 +138,15 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> /* make pte_list_desc fit well in cache lines */
> -#define PTE_LIST_EXT 15
> +#define PTE_LIST_EXT 14
Doh, I looked at kvm/queue code before looking at the full series.
> struct pte_list_desc {
> u64 *sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT];
> + /*
> + * Stores number of entries stored in the pte_list_desc. No need to be
> + * u64 but just for easier alignment. When PTE_LIST_EXT, means full.
> + */
> + u64 spte_count;
Per my feedback to the previous patch, this should be above sptes[] so that rmaps
with <8 SPTEs only touch one cache line. No idea if it actually matters in
practice, but I can't see how it would harm anything.
> struct pte_list_desc *more;
> };
