Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] My AVIC patch queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/07/21 16:20, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi!

This is a series of bugfixes to the AVIC dynamic inhibition, which was
made while trying to fix bugs as much as possible, in this area and trying
to make the AVIC+SYNIC conditional enablement work.

* Patches 1-4 address an issue of possible
   mismatch between the AVIC inhibit state and AVIC enable state on all vCPUs.

   Since AVICs state is changed via a request there is a window during which
   the states differ which can lead to various warnings and errors.

   There was an earlier attempt to fix this by changing the AVIC enable state
   on the current vCPU immediately when the AVIC inhibit request is created,
   however while this fixes the common case, it actually hides the issue deeper,
   because on all other vCPUs but current one, the two states can still
   mismatch till the KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE is processed on each of them.

   My take on this is to fix the places where the mismatch causes the
   issues instead and then drop the special case of toggling the AVIC right
   away in kvm_request_apicv_update.

   V2: I rewrote the commit description for the patch that touches
     avic inhibition in nested case.

* Patches 5-6 in this series fix a race condition which can cause
   a lost write from a guest to APIC when the APIC write races
   the AVIC un-inhibition, and add a warning to catch this problem
   if it re-emerges again.

   V2: I re-implemented this with a mutex in V2.

* Patch 7 is an  fix yet another issue I found in AVIC inhibit code:
   Currently avic_vcpu_load/avic_vcpu_put are called on userspace entry/exit
   from KVM (aka kvm_vcpu_get/kvm_vcpu_put), and these functions update the
   "is running" bit in the AVIC physical ID remap table and update the
   target vCPU in iommu code.

   However both of these functions don't do anything when AVIC is inhibited
   thus the "is running" bit will be kept enabled during exit to userspace.
   This shouldn't be a big issue as the caller
   doesn't use the AVIC when inhibited but still inconsistent and can trigger
   a warning about this in avic_vcpu_load.

   To be on the safe side I think it makes sense to call
   avic_vcpu_put/avic_vcpu_load when inhibiting/uninhibiting the AVIC.
   This will ensure that the work these functions do is matched.

* Patch 8 is the patch from Vitaly about allowing AVIC with SYNC
   as long as the guest doesn’t use the AutoEOI feature. I only slightly
   changed it to drop the SRCU lock around call to kvm_request_apicv_update
   and also expose the AutoEOI cpuid bit regardless of AVIC enablement.

   Despite the fact that this is the last patch in this series, this patch
   doesn't depend on the other fixes.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

Maxim Levitsky (7):
   KVM: SVM: svm_set_vintr don't warn if AVIC is active but is about to
     be deactivated
   KVM: SVM: tweak warning about enabled AVIC on nested entry
   KVM: SVM: use vmcb01 in svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl
   KVM: x86: APICv: drop immediate APICv disablement on current vCPU
   KVM: x86: APICv: fix race in kvm_request_apicv_update on SVM
   KVM: SVM: add warning for mistmatch between AVIC state and AVIC access
     page state
   KVM: SVM: call avic_vcpu_load/avic_vcpu_put when enabling/disabling
     AVIC

Vitaly Kuznetsov (1):
   KVM: x86: hyper-v: Deactivate APICv only when AutoEOI feature is in
     use

  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++
  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c           | 34 ++++++++++++++++----
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c         | 45 ++++++++++++++------------
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c       |  2 +-
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          | 18 ++++++++---
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 57 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
  include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  1 +
  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |  1 +
  8 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)


Queued patches 1-4, thanks.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux