Right now, svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments has an incorrect dereference of vmcb->control.reserved_sw before the vmcb is checked for being non-NULL. The compiler is usually sinking the dereference after the check; instead of doing this ourselves in the source, ensure that svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments is only called with a non-NULL VMCB. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vineeth Pillai <viremana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> [Untested for now due to issues with my AMD machine. - Paolo] --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 9a6987549e1b..4bcb95bb8ed7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -1406,8 +1406,6 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) goto error_free_vmsa_page; } - svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm); - svm->vmcb01.ptr = page_address(vmcb01_page); svm->vmcb01.pa = __sme_set(page_to_pfn(vmcb01_page) << PAGE_SHIFT); @@ -1419,6 +1417,8 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01); init_vmcb(vcpu); + svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm); + svm_init_osvw(vcpu); vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x01000065; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h index 9b9a55abc29f..c53b8bf8d013 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static inline void svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments( * as we mark it dirty unconditionally towards end of vcpu * init phase. */ - if (vmcb && vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) && + if (vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) && hve->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap) vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS); } -- 2.27.0
