On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:03:20PM -0600, David S. Ahern wrote: > > On 10/30/2009 09:28 AM, Chris Lalancette wrote: > >> > >> For VMX, the guests TSC's are now usually synchronized (which was not > >> the case before, when this patch was written). For AMD, they start out > >> of sync. > >> > >> Migration also causes them to be out of sync. So i'd prefer to postpone > >> the removal of this limitation until there is a guarantee the TSCs > >> are synchronized across vcpus. > > > > OK. I'll try to get on an unsynchronized TSC machine and see if I can reproduce > > there. > > Perhaps Marcelo was referring to his patchset from December 2008 > targeting TSC synchronization? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg08071.html > > David Yes, unsynchronized TSCs in the guest perspective. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html