On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 5:39 AM Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 14:30 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_ACK MSR is part of interrupt based asynchronous page fault
> > interface and not the original (deprecated) KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF. This is
> > stated in Documentation/virt/kvm/msr.rst.
> >
> > Fixes: 66570e966dd9 ("kvm: x86: only provide PV features if enabled in guest's CPUID")
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index d715ae9f9108..88ff7a1af198 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -3406,7 +3406,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > return 1;
> > break;
> > case MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_ACK:
> > - if (!guest_pv_has(vcpu, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF))
> > + if (!guest_pv_has(vcpu, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF_INT))
> > return 1;
> > if (data & 0x1) {
> > vcpu->arch.apf.pageready_pending = false;
> > @@ -3745,7 +3745,7 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.apf.msr_int_val;
> > break;
> > case MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_ACK:
> > - if (!guest_pv_has(vcpu, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF))
> > + if (!guest_pv_has(vcpu, KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF_INT))
> > return 1;
> >
> > msr_info->data = 0;
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
