Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 07, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The guest pages of the SEV-SNP VM maybe added as a private page in the
> RMP entry (assigned bit is set). The guest private pages must be
> transitioned to the hypervisor state before its freed.

Isn't this patch needed much earlier in the series, i.e. when the first RMPUPDATE
usage goes in?

> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 1f0635ac9ff9..4468995dd209 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -1940,6 +1940,45 @@ find_enc_region(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enc_region *range)
>  static void __unregister_enc_region_locked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  					   struct enc_region *region)
>  {
> +	struct rmpupdate val = {};
> +	unsigned long i, pfn;
> +	struct rmpentry *e;
> +	int level, rc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The guest memory pages are assigned in the RMP table. Unassign it
> +	 * before releasing the memory.
> +	 */
> +	if (sev_snp_guest(kvm)) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < region->npages; i++) {
> +			pfn = page_to_pfn(region->pages[i]);
> +
> +			if (need_resched())
> +				schedule();

This can simply be "cond_resched();"

> +
> +			e = snp_lookup_page_in_rmptable(region->pages[i], &level);
> +			if (unlikely(!e))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			/* If its not a guest assigned page then skip it. */
> +			if (!rmpentry_assigned(e))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			/* Is the page part of a 2MB RMP entry? */
> +			if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M) {
> +				val.pagesize = RMP_PG_SIZE_2M;
> +				pfn &= ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(PG_LEVEL_2M) - 1);
> +			} else {
> +				val.pagesize = RMP_PG_SIZE_4K;

This raises yet more questions (for me) as to the interaction between Page-Size
and Hyperivsor-Owned flags in the RMP.  It also raises questions on the correctness
of zeroing the RMP entry if KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_START (in the previous patch).

> +			}
> +
> +			/* Transition the page to hypervisor owned. */
> +			rc = rmpupdate(pfn_to_page(pfn), &val);
> +			if (rc)
> +				pr_err("Failed to release pfn 0x%lx ret=%d\n", pfn, rc);

This is not robust, e.g. KVM will unpin the memory and release it back to the
kernel with a stale RMP entry.  Shouldn't this be a WARN+leak situation?

> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	sev_unpin_memory(kvm, region->pages, region->npages);
>  	list_del(&region->list);
>  	kfree(region);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux