On 03/07/21 00:04, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
+ trace_kvm_tdx_seamcall_enter(smp_processor_id(), op, + rcx, rdx, r8, r9, r10); + err = __seamcall(op, rcx, rdx, r8, r9, r10, ex); + if (ex) + trace_kvm_tdx_seamcall_exit(smp_processor_id(), op, err, ex->rcx, + ex->rdx, ex->r8, ex->r9, ex->r10, + ex->r11); + else + trace_kvm_tdx_seamcall_exit(smp_processor_id(), op, err, + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
Would it make sense to do the zeroing of ex directly in __seamcall in case there is an error?
Otherwise looks good. Paolo
