It is possible that AVIC was requested to be disabled but not yet disabled, e.g if the nested entry is done right after svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c index dca20f949b63..253847f7d9aa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm) * Also covers avic_vapic_bar, avic_backing_page, avic_logical_id, * avic_physical_id. */ - WARN_ON(svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.int_ctl & AVIC_ENABLE_MASK); + WARN_ON(kvm_apicv_activated(svm->vcpu.kvm)); /* Copied from vmcb01. msrpm_base can be overwritten later. */ svm->vmcb->control.nested_ctl = svm->vmcb01.ptr->control.nested_ctl; -- 2.26.3