On (21/06/05 11:15), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > For the time being kvm_set_guest_paused() errors out when
> > !vcpu->arch.pv_time_enabled, but this probably can change in the
> > future (who knows?). So shall I check vcpu->arch.pv_time_enabled in
> > kvm_arch_suspend_notifier()?
>
> That, or check for the -EINVAL return value.
I suppose this should do the trick then (hate to do `int ret = 0`,
but we can have no VCPUs with enabled pv_time)
---
+static int kvm_arch_suspend_notifier(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int i, ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+ if (!vcpu->arch.pv_time_enabled)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = kvm_set_guest_paused(vcpu);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to pause guest VCPU%d: %d\n",
+ vcpu->vcpu_id, ret);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+
+ return ret ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
