Re: I/O performance of VirtIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/2009 12:06 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:

Am 22.10.2009 um 18:29 schrieb Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On 10/13/2009 08:35 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
It can be particularly slow if you use in-kernel irqchips and the
default NIC emulation (up to 10 times slower), some effect I always
wanted to understand on a rainy day. So, when you actually want -net
user, try -no-kvm-irqchip.


This might be due to a missing SIGIO or SIGALRM; -no-kvm-irqchip generates a lot of extra signals and thus polling opportunities.

Isn't that what dedicated io threads are supposed to solve?


No. Dedicated I/O threads provide parallelism. All latency needs is to have SIGIO sent on all file descriptors (or rather, in qemu-kvm with irqchip, to have all file descriptors in the poll() call).

Jan, does slirp add new connections to the select set?

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux